UK PM’s response to No10 custody death petition

28Apr09

gordon-brown

Statement issued by 10 Downing Street
28th April 2009

The Government takes this issue very seriously. The Government also deeply sympathises with those who have lost family members in such tragic circumstances.

………………………………………………..

All incidents where someone has died following direct or indirect contact with the police must, by law, be referred by the force concerned to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), an independent body with responsibility for the police complaints system and the investigation of the most serious incidents. The IPCC will then assess whether the matter should be investigated using its own investigators or whether the matter can be investigated by the police under the direction and control or supervision of the IPCC.

If, during the course of an investigation, there is an indication that a person serving with the police may have committed a criminal offence or behaved in a manner that would justify the bringing of disciplinary proceedings, then that person is informed that they are subject of investigation. A decision will also be made as to whether the person subject to investigation should be suspended from duty whilst the investigation takes place.

At the conclusion of the investigation, if there is an indication that a person serving with the police may have committed a criminal offence, the matter will be referred to the Crown Prosecution Service for a decision as to whether any charges should be brought. This procedure will be followed irrespective of whether the officer subject to investigation has retired or resigned from the police service.

Whether a case should be reviewed again following an ‘unlawful killing’ verdict at an inquest is also a matter for the Crown Prosecution Service.

The Mental Health Act Commission reviews the deaths of all patients who have died from non-natural causes. The Commission publishes information on the deaths of detained patients in its Biennial Report. In all circumstances families should be informed about the process of investigation and how they may be involved.

All prisoner deaths are investigated by the police and the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman (PPO). Following a death the PPO investigates and publishes a report of their findings after the inquest. Moreover, all deaths in prison custody are also subject to a Coroner’s inquest before a jury.

More generally, the Government seeks to help the families of those who die in state custody through the provision of timely, sympathetic information and support. The National Offender Management Service, for example, has developed an effective system of well-trained family liaison officers which is improving its work with families in these circumstances, and the PPO assigns a family liaison officer in every case they independently investigate.

See it on the No10 Website >

………………………………………………..

Many thanks for your continued support.
The 4WardEver UK Team

Advertisements


2 Responses to “UK PM’s response to No10 custody death petition”

  1. If the systems are in place, why is it that thus far there has never been an officer even prosecuted for manslaughter?

    None for miscarriage of justice.

    Where exactly are they recruiting these saints?

    It would be interesting to find out what officers have been found guilty of while on duty.

    I feel a freedom of information request coming on.

    I despise this automated, stock response that is clearly written by some faceless employee. I may be wrong, but it would explain why the country is in the situation it is if Brown is giving responses to petitions such as these personal attention. If it were a TV comercial then the company would be pursued for false advertising imo.

    The insult to the Rigg family is tangible. It is utter disrespect to his family considering their loss and rights to accountability to respond in such a way. If I were in their shoes, I think I would have prefered it personally if they had said nothing.

    This seems to be lip service to the illusion that the government are listening. It is my opinion they are not.

    More public support for change is needed. Please watch my video and forward it if you find you can agree with it.

  2. 2 Sam

    Tippa, Yes I agree, this is an absolutely lame and robotical response – It’s sad that we have to spell out to them that the system they currently have in place is failing families appallingly. We may have to start another petition in more detail pointing out the detailed failings of the IPCC, police investigations into prison deaths and the Mental Heath Act Commission.

    I spoke Brenda Weinberg (UFFC) recently and her suggestion is that we draw up a questionnaire which will be distributed by INQUEST to all victims families, for their experiences of the IPCC and appropriate bodies on their investigations into their loved ones death.

    It will be quite a simple questionnaire consisting of around 3 questions where their response can be as detailed as they wish. This we will send up to the relevant ministers so they have a proper account of public feeling – we are in the process of drawing up the questions and discussing with INQUEST how we can take this forward.

    Stay in touch.

    WeAreInThisTogether
    Bless
    Sam


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s